How much is your time worth?  Respondent Incentives

For many years, the research industry has been battling over one important question:  How much should we pay respondents?

At first, the answer seems simple.  Longer surveys will yield higher incentives.  Harder audiences will receive higher payout.  But the reality is far more complex and extremely important to the future of our industry.

The Marketing Research industry has a time valuation problem.  The average consumer today is overwhelmed with requests for their attention.  Emails, Ads, Notifications, Social Content, Loyalty programs, Streaming Platforms… Everyone wants a piece of their time.

And still, in Market Research, many times, we expect respondents to complete a 20-minute survey for less than the cost of a soda. 

When respondents feel undercompensated data suffers.  Respondent engagement drops, speeding increases, open-end quality declines, fraud increases, and overall trust in the data and the research are diminished.

Incentives are about More than Just Money

For many respondents, compensation is about more than just points or a dollar amount.  They want to feel as though they are part of the process, that their input is helping to drive change to their favorite products or servicesRespondents are aware of survey length, repetitiveness, mobile friendliness, frequency of invitations, payment speed and fairness to the amount of effort that is asked of them.  A well designed 10-minute survey with instant payment may feel more rewarding than a frustrating 20-mintue survey with a higher incentive.

Instead of asking: how cheaply can we field this study?  Our industry should be asking:

  • How do we build longer term respondent trust?
  • How do we create a better respondent experience?
  • How can we reduce burnout and keep panelists longer?
  • How can we reward honesty and engagement?
  • How do we make the respondent feel valued?

How can we Improve?

The future of the Market Research Industry depends on people continuing to participate and provide high qualitydata.Upfront, the respondents should be aware of survey length, effort involved, reward structure, and even payment timing.  Transparency builds trust.  We need to design better surveys that remove redundancy and make it easier for respondents to qualify.  Reward quality, not just completion- make payments higher for thoughtful insights and long-term participation.

Without respondents, there is no research industry.  What is human attention worth?  In a world where data is driving billion-dollar decisions, you would think the people providing the data to drive these decisions are worth more than a dollar or a handful of points. Rethinking how we value respondents may be one of the most important steps towards improving data quality, rebuilding trust in the industry, and ensuring the future of the Market Research industry is strong.

About Author

With more than 20 years at Dynata, Michele Frisella is a Senior Business Development Manager with deep expertise in marketing research and client consulting. Throughout her career, she has partnered with leading brands and consultancies to help solve complex business challenges through data-driven insights and strategic research solutions. Michele is recognized for combing industry knowledge, strategic thinking, and client advocacy to deliver measurable value and drive successful outcomes for clients across a wide range of industries.